Skip to content

architecture-advisor

Architecture selection advisor for .NET applications. Asks structured questions about domain complexity, team size, system lifetime, compliance, and integration needs, then recommends the best-fit architecture: Vertical Slice, Clean Architecture, DDD + Clean Architecture, or Modular Monolith. Load this skill when the user asks "which architecture", "choose architecture", "set up project", "new project", "architecture decision", "restructure", or "how should I organize". Always load BEFORE any architecture-specific skill.

2,811
installs
0 up / 0 down, score 0.00
votes
782
repo stars
Updated
3 months ago
In the catalog since
1 Oct 2026
From
codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit
Get it through your agent npx skills add codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit@architecture-advisor

Skill instructions

Rendered from the published SKILL.md, 238 lines.

Architecture Advisor

Core Principles

  1. Ask before recommending — Never prescribe an architecture without understanding the project. Run the questionnaire first to gather context about domain, team, lifetime, and constraints.
  2. Right-size the architecture — The best architecture is the simplest one that handles the project's actual complexity. CRUD apps do not need DDD. Startups do not need Clean Architecture. Match complexity to real requirements, not aspirations.
  3. Architecture is not permanent — Every architecture has an evolution path. Start simple and add structure when complexity demands it. Document the decision so the team knows when to evolve.
  4. Four supported architectures — dotnet-claude-kit provides first-class patterns for Vertical Slice Architecture (VSA), Clean Architecture (CA), DDD + Clean Architecture, and Modular Monolith. Each has specific strengths and trade-offs.

The Architecture Questionnaire

Before recommending an architecture, ask questions across these 6 categories. Not every question applies to every project — skip irrelevant ones.

Category 1: Domain Complexity

# Question Low Signal High Signal
1 How many distinct business entities does the system manage? < 10 entities 20+ entities with relationships
2 Do business rules involve multiple entities interacting? Rules are per-entity CRUD Complex invariants across entity groups
3 Are there business workflows with multiple steps? Simple request → response Sagas, approval chains, state machines
4 Do domain experts use specialized vocabulary? Generic terms (create, update) Ubiquitous language (underwrite, adjudicate)

Category 2: Team & Organization

# Question Low Signal High Signal
5 How large is the development team? 1-3 developers 8+ developers, multiple teams
6 Do different teams own different parts of the system? Single team owns everything Teams aligned to business domains
7 What is the team's experience level with .NET? Junior or mixed Senior, experienced with patterns

Category 3: System Lifetime & Scale

# Question Low Signal High Signal
8 Expected system lifetime? < 2 years, MVP/prototype 5+ years, long-lived product
9 How many concurrent users or requests per second? < 100 RPS 1000+ RPS, variable load
10 Will the system need to scale independently by feature area? Uniform load Hot spots need independent scaling

Category 4: Regulatory & Compliance

# Question Low Signal High Signal
11 Are there audit trail or compliance requirements? Basic logging sufficient Full audit trail, SOX/HIPAA/PCI
12 Do different parts of the system have different security boundaries? Single auth boundary Multi-tenant, data isolation

Category 5: Existing Codebase

# Question Low Signal High Signal
13 Is this greenfield or brownfield? Greenfield, starting fresh Brownfield, migrating from legacy
14 Are there existing architectural patterns the team follows? No established patterns Strong conventions in place

Category 6: Integration Complexity

# Question Low Signal High Signal
15 How many external systems does this integrate with? 0-2 simple APIs 5+ systems with complex contracts
16 Are there event-driven or async communication needs? Synchronous request/response Event sourcing, pub/sub, eventual consistency

Decision Matrix

Map questionnaire answers to architecture recommendations:

Profile Recommended Architecture Why
Low domain complexity, small team, short lifetime Vertical Slice Architecture Minimal ceremony, fast feature delivery, easy to understand
Low-medium domain complexity, any team size, API-focused Vertical Slice Architecture Feature cohesion, one file per operation, natural fit for minimal APIs
Medium domain complexity, medium team, long lifetime Clean Architecture Enforced boundaries via project references, testable domain, clear dependency direction
High domain complexity, specialized vocabulary, complex invariants DDD + Clean Architecture Aggregates protect invariants, value objects model domain concepts, domain events decouple side effects
Multiple bounded contexts, team-per-domain, independent deployment potential Modular Monolith Module isolation, independent data stores, evolution path to microservices
Brownfield with existing layered architecture Clean Architecture Familiar to teams coming from N-tier, preserves layer separation with better dependency direction

When Signals Conflict

If signals point to different architectures:

  1. Default to simpler — When in doubt, start with VSA and evolve
  2. Domain complexity wins — High domain complexity overrides team size and lifetime signals
  3. Team familiarity matters — A team experienced with CA will be more productive with CA than learning VSA, even if VSA is technically simpler
  4. Compliance drives structure — Regulatory requirements often force stricter boundaries (CA or DDD)

Patterns

Vertical Slice Architecture (VSA)

Organize by feature, not by layer. Each operation is a self-contained slice.

src/MyApp.Api/
  Features/
    Orders/CreateOrder.cs    # Request + Handler + Response + Endpoint
    Orders/GetOrder.cs
  Common/
    Behaviors/ValidationBehavior.cs
    Persistence/AppDbContext.cs

Best for: CRUD-heavy apps, APIs, MVPs, small-medium teams, short-medium lifetime. Load skill: vertical-slice

Clean Architecture (CA)

Concentric layers with dependency inversion. Domain at the center, infrastructure at the edge.

src/
  MyApp.Domain/              # Entities, interfaces, domain logic
  MyApp.Application/         # Use cases, DTOs, validation
  MyApp.Infrastructure/      # EF Core, external services
  MyApp.Api/                 # Endpoints, middleware

Best for: Medium complexity, long-lived systems, teams familiar with layered patterns. Load skill: clean-architecture

DDD + Clean Architecture

Clean Architecture with tactical DDD patterns: aggregates, value objects, domain events.

Show the whole skill (118 more lines)

src/ MyApp.Domain/ # Aggregates, value objects, domain events, domain services MyApp.Application/ # Use cases orchestrating aggregates MyApp.Infrastructure/ # Persistence, external service adapters MyApp.Api/ # Thin endpoints


**Best for:** Complex domains, specialized vocabulary, strict invariants, experienced teams.
**Load skill:** `ddd` + `clean-architecture`

### Modular Monolith

Independent modules in a single deployable unit, each with its own architecture internally.

src/ MyApp.Host/ # Wires modules together Modules/ Orders/ # Own features, own DbContext, own architecture Catalog/ # Can use VSA, CA, or DDD internally MyApp.Shared/ # Integration event contracts only


**Best for:** Multiple bounded contexts, team-per-domain, future microservices extraction.
**Load template:** `modular-monolith`

## Evolution Paths

Architecture is not a one-time decision. Systems evolve. Here are the common migration paths:

| From | To | Trigger | How |
|------|----|---------|-----|
| VSA | CA | Domain logic growing beyond handlers | Extract Domain + Application layers, keep features as use cases |
| VSA | Modular Monolith | Multiple bounded contexts emerging | Group features into modules, add module boundaries |
| CA | DDD + CA | Invariants becoming complex, primitive obsession | Introduce aggregates, value objects, domain events |
| Monolith | Modular Monolith | Teams stepping on each other, shared database coupling | Split into modules with own DbContexts and schemas |
| Modular Monolith | Microservices | Independent scaling needs, independent deployment | Extract modules into separate deployable services |

## Anti-patterns

### Picking Clean Architecture for a CRUD App

// BAD — 4 projects, 6+ files per feature for simple CRUD src/MyApp.Domain/Entities/Product.cs src/MyApp.Application/Products/CreateProduct/CreateProductCommand.cs src/MyApp.Application/Products/CreateProduct/CreateProductHandler.cs src/MyApp.Application/Products/CreateProduct/CreateProductValidator.cs src/MyApp.Infrastructure/Persistence/ProductRepository.cs src/MyApp.Api/Endpoints/ProductEndpoints.cs

// GOOD — VSA: 1 file for a simple CRUD feature src/MyApp.Api/Features/Products/CreateProduct.cs


### DDD Everywhere

// BAD — value objects and aggregates for a settings table public class UserSettings : AggregateRoot // overkill { public ThemeName Theme { get; private set; } // value object for "dark"/"light"? public void ChangeTheme(ThemeName theme) { /* domain event? really? */ } }

// GOOD — simple entity for simple data public class UserSettings { public Guid UserId { get; init; } public string Theme { get; set; } = "light"; }


### Premature Microservices

// BAD — splitting into 5 microservices on day one with 2 developers OrderService (own repo, own DB, own CI/CD) CatalogService (own repo, own DB, own CI/CD) IdentityService (own repo, own DB, own CI/CD) NotificationService (own repo, own DB, own CI/CD) GatewayService (own repo, own CI/CD)

// GOOD — start as a modular monolith, extract when you have evidence src/ Modules/Orders/ Modules/Catalog/ Modules/Identity/ Modules/Notifications/


### Skipping the Questionnaire

// BAD — "I always use Clean Architecture" User: "Set up a new project for a todo app" Agent: immediately scaffolds 4-project CA solution

// GOOD — ask first, then recommend User: "Set up a new project for a todo app" Agent: "Let me ask a few questions about your project to recommend the best architecture..." Agent: runs questionnaire, recommends VSA for low-complexity app


## Decision Guide

| Scenario | Recommendation |
|----------|---------------|
| New project, unknown requirements | Run the questionnaire |
| Simple CRUD API, 1-3 developers | VSA |
| Medium complexity, long-lived, experienced team | Clean Architecture |
| Complex domain, specialized vocabulary | DDD + Clean Architecture |
| Multiple bounded contexts, multiple teams | Modular Monolith |
| Existing N-tier codebase, needs modernization | Clean Architecture (familiar migration) |
| MVP / startup, speed is priority | VSA |
| Regulatory / compliance-heavy | Clean Architecture or DDD (enforced boundaries) |
| Will need independent scaling later | Modular Monolith (extraction-ready) |