caveman-manage
Inspect Caveman Cloud's experiment lifecycle and block unsafe execution. Use when asked to start, approve, cancel, promote or roll back a Caveman experiment.
- 57,800
- installs
- In the catalog since
- 18 Sept 2026
- From
- juliusbrussee/caveman
Get it through your agent
npx skills add juliusbrussee/caveman@caveman-manage Skill instructions
SKILL.md as published, 105 lines.
# Manage eval-gated experiments
Treat every lifecycle change as a production control action. Read current state
and results, then report one supported recommendation or block.
Current agent MCP is intentionally read-only: control-api does not yet enforce a
complete lifecycle transition table and evidence gate atomically.
## Non-negotiable gates
1. A request to review, inspect, explain, or recommend authorizes reads only.
2. Never approve an experiment whose results are pending, whose required
guardrails are absent, or whose evidence reports a breach.
3. Never convert experiment lift into `verified_savings`. Only active real
traffic plus provider-causal, provider-complete ledger evidence can do that.
4. Never supply an organization id. Project and tenant scope come from the
logged-in Caveman identity and server RBAC.
5. Never execute a lifecycle mutation, even after user approval. Exact
`<action>:<experiment_id>` strings are agent-generatable and are not proof of
human intent.
6. Unknown states and server errors fail closed. Report exact
`cave_snake_code`.
## Step 1 — Load project and experiment
Prefer MCP:
```text
caveman_context {}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"get","experiment_id":"<id>"}
caveman_experiment_get {"action":"results","experiment_id":"<id>"}
```
Use `{"action":"list"}` when the user has not named an id.
CLI fallback:
```bash
caveman cloud experiments list
caveman cloud experiments show <id>
caveman cloud experiments results <id>
```
Stop if login, project, experiment, or results are unavailable.
## Step 2 — Evaluate evidence
Report:
- current lifecycle state and safety class;
- control and candidate sample sizes;
- quality or eval result;
- latency, error, cost, retry, drop, and escalation guardrails when present;
- evidence cost;
- rollback or hold reason;
- whether result is pending, failed, promotable, or active.
Absence is not a pass. If a required field is absent, state
`evidence incomplete` and do not propose approval.
## Step 3 — Propose one action Show the whole skill (45 more lines)
Allowed actions: - `start` — only from a startable draft or queued state with configured graders; - `approve` — only with complete passing evidence and a safety class the current role may approve; - `cancel` — stop a non-active experiment the user no longer wants; - `rollback` — revert an active or harmful change through the server's linked policy path. Current deployments may reject this honestly with `cave_not_implemented`; never describe that response as a rollback. Show recommendation and id: ```text Proposed action: approve experiment 7f... Reason: candidate passed quality and every configured guardrail. Execution: blocked until server-authoritative lifecycle and evidence gates ship. ``` Do not treat earlier generic statements such as "manage it" or "do what is best" as mutation approval. ## Step 4 — Block unsafe execution Do not emit or run an executable lifecycle command. Explain that current server does not yet enforce every evidence/state transition atomically. CLI and MCP agent surfaces therefore expose experiment reads only. ## Step 5 — Re-read after external operator action If operator says they executed command, read detail and results again. Report server-observed post-state, audit or result response, and any policy-delivery status returned. Never infer success from operator intent alone. Use this close: ```text Action: <action> <experiment-id> Before: <state> Server response: <status and cave_snake_code if any> After: <re-read state> Basis: experiment evidence only. Verified savings unchanged unless the signed ledger independently records active, provider-causal real-traffic savings. ```