edge-signal-aggregator
Aggregate and rank signals from multiple edge-finding skills (edge-candidate-agent, theme-detector, sector-analyst, institutional-flow-tracker) into a prioritized conviction dashboard with weighted scoring, deduplication, and contradiction detection.
- 3,157
- installs
- 0 up / 0 down, score 0.00
- votes
- 3,171
- repo stars
- Updated
- less than a month ago
- In the catalog since
- 1 Oct 2026
- From
- tradermonty/claude-trading-skills
Skill instructions
Rendered from the published SKILL.md, 304 lines.
Edge Signal Aggregator
Overview
Combine outputs from multiple upstream edge-finding skills into a single weighted conviction dashboard. This skill applies configurable signal weights, deduplicates overlapping themes, flags contradictions between skills, and ranks composite edge ideas by aggregate confidence score. The result is a prioritized edge shortlist with provenance links to each contributing skill.
When to Use
- After running multiple edge-finding skills and wanting a unified view
- When consolidating signals from edge-candidate-agent, theme-detector, sector-analyst, and institutional-flow-tracker
- Before making portfolio allocation decisions based on multiple signal sources
- To identify contradictions between different analysis approaches
- When prioritizing which edge ideas deserve deeper research
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+
- No API keys required (processes local JSON/YAML files from other skills)
- Dependencies:
pyyaml(standard in most environments)
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Upstream Skill Outputs
Collect output files from the upstream skills you want to aggregate:
reports/edge_candidate_*.jsonfrom edge-candidate-agentreports/edge_concepts_*.yamlfrom edge-concept-synthesizerreports/theme_detector_*.jsonfrom theme-detectorreports/sector_analyst_*.jsonfrom sector-analystreports/institutional_flow_*.jsonfrom institutional-flow-trackerreports/edge_hints_*.yamlfrom edge-hint-extractor
Step 2: Run Signal Aggregation
Execute the aggregator script with paths to upstream outputs:
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--edge-concepts reports/edge_concepts_*.yaml \
--themes reports/theme_detector_*.json \
--sectors reports/sector_analyst_*.json \
--institutional reports/institutional_flow_*.json \
--hints reports/edge_hints_*.yaml \
--output-dir reports/
Optional: Use a custom weights configuration:
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--weights-config skills/edge-signal-aggregator/assets/custom_weights.yaml \
--output-dir reports/
Step 3: Review Aggregated Dashboard
Open the generated report to review:
- Ranked Edge Ideas - Sorted by composite conviction score
- Signal Provenance - Which skills contributed to each idea
- Contradictions - Conflicting signals flagged for manual review
- Deduplication Log - Merged overlapping themes
Step 4: Act on High-Conviction Signals
Filter the shortlist by minimum conviction threshold:
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--min-conviction 0.7 \
--output-dir reports/
Output Format
JSON Report
{
"schema_version": "1.1",
"generated_at": "2026-03-02T07:00:00Z",
"config": {
"weights": {
"edge_candidate_agent": 0.25,
"edge_concept_synthesizer": 0.20,
"theme_detector": 0.15,
"sector_analyst": 0.15,
"institutional_flow_tracker": 0.15,
"edge_hint_extractor": 0.10
},
"min_conviction": 0.5,
"dedup_similarity_threshold": 0.8
},
"summary": {
"total_input_signals": 42,
"unique_signals_after_dedup": 28,
"contradictions_found": 3,
"signals_above_threshold": 12,
"invalid_signals_dropped": 2,
"idempotency_check": {
"total_input_signals": 42,
"unique_evidence_ids": 28,
"duplicate_copies_merged": 14,
"independent_units_total": 30
}
},
"ranked_signals": [
{
"rank": 1,
"signal_id": "sig_001",
"title": "AI Infrastructure Capex Acceleration",
"composite_score": 0.87,
"evidence_id": "ticket_2026-03-01_001",
"score_scale_assumed": false,
"contributing_skills": [
{
"skill": "edge_candidate_agent",
"signal_ref": "ticket_2026-03-01_001",
Show the whole skill (184 more lines)
"raw_score": 0.92,
"weighted_contribution": 0.23,
"evidence_id": "ticket_2026-03-01_001",
"event_fingerprint": "sha1-of-title-and-tickers"
},
{
"skill": "theme_detector",
"signal_ref": "theme_ai_infra",
"raw_score": 0.85,
"weighted_contribution": 0.13
}
],
"tickers": ["NVDA", "AMD", "AVGO"],
"direction": "LONG",
"time_horizon": "3-6 months",
"confidence_breakdown": {
"multi_skill_agreement": 0.30,
"signal_strength": 0.35,
"recency": 0.22
}
}
], "contradictions": [ { "contradiction_id": "contra_001", "description": "Conflicting sector view on Energy", "skill_a": { "skill": "sector_analyst", "signal": "Energy sector bearish rotation", "direction": "SHORT" }, "skill_b": { "skill": "institutional_flow_tracker", "signal": "Heavy institutional buying in XLE", "direction": "LONG" }, "resolution_hint": "Check timeframe mismatch (short-term vs long-term)" } ], "deduplication_log": [ { "merged_into": "edge_candidate_agent:ticket_001", "duplicates_removed": ["edge_candidate_agent:ticket_001@reports/ticket_001.json"], "similarity_score": 1.0, "reason": "same evidence re-ingested", "selection_rule": "newest timestamp wins; ties, missing, or unparsable timestamps keep the highest raw_score, then a stable key", "retained_copy": { "signal_ref": "ticket_001", "source_file": "reports/rerun.json", "raw_score": 0.5, "timestamp": "2026-10-10T00:00:00Z" }, "discarded_copies": [ { "signal_ref": "ticket_001", "source_file": "reports/ticket_001.json", "raw_score": 0.9, "timestamp": "2026-10-09T00:00:00Z" } ] }, { "merged_into": "edge_candidate_agent:ticket_001", "duplicates_removed": ["theme_detector:ai_compute"], "similarity_score": 0.9 } ], "invalid_signals": [ { "skill": "theme_detector", "signal_ref": "broken_theme", "title": "Theme with a corrupted score", "reason": "non_finite", "declared_scale": null, "raw_value_repr": "nan", "source_file": "reports/theme_detector_2026-03-01.json" } ], "scale_assumptions_report": [ { "skill": "theme_detector", "signal_ref": "ai_compute", "value": 7.2, "normalized_value": 0.072, "assumed_scale": "0-100", "source_file": "reports/theme_detector.json" } ] }
### Producer contract (optional keys, schema 1.1)
Each producer item (ticket, concept, theme, sector row, flow, hint) MAY carry:
- `evidence_id` — a stable identifier for the underlying evidence. Without this key a
deterministic fallback is derived from skill, signal reference, title, tickers, and direction
(timestamps are excluded so refreshed timestamps cannot forge a new identity). Re-ingesting
the same evidence (same skill + `evidence_id`) never adds a bonus: all copies collapse into
one. When the copies differ, the **newest observation wins**: the copy with the latest
timestamp, compared as parsed timezone-aware datetimes (date-only and naive values are read
as UTC), becomes the retained score. Equal, missing, or unparsable timestamps fall back to
the highest `raw_score`, then a stable key (`signal_ref`, `source_file`), so ingestion order
never changes the result. Only ISO-8601 strings (or `YYYY-MM-DD`) are ordered; epoch numbers and compact forms such as `20261010` count as missing timestamps. Remaining full ties are broken by title, direction, tickers, and a canonical dump of the signal. A copy that carries a score older than the retained one is
discarded, so a newer, lower score replaces an older, higher one. The discarded copies'
scores and timestamps are listed in `deduplication_log[].discarded_copies`. Identical
copies leave the score unchanged.
- `score_scale` — `"0-1"` or `"0-100"`, declaring the raw score's scale. Declared scales are
enforced strictly: NaN/infinity/negative/out-of-range values are rejected into
`invalid_signals`, never converted into maximum confidence. A present-but-unparsable
declaration (`""`, `"foo"`) is also rejected (`missing_scale`). If the key is absent, values
in (1, 100] are divided by 100 and flagged `score_scale_assumed: true` plus a
`scale_assumptions_report` entry (`value` is the original input, `normalized_value` the
0-1 score used); values > 100 are rejected.
### Agreement rule (Issue #510)
Agreement bonuses fire on `agreement_tier = min(distinct evidence_ids, distinct
event_fingerprints, distinct skills)` among a merged signal's contributors: tier 2 earns the
two-skills bonus, tier 3+ the three-plus bonus. Re-ingested duplicates earn nothing; the same
event restated by another skill (identical normalized title + tickers) counts once. Known
limitation: the event fingerprint is vocabulary-based, so paraphrased restatements with disjoint
word sets still earn the agreement bonus — treat cross-skill paraphrases with independent
verification. Merged duplicates no longer earn a per-copy bonus (`merge_bonus_per_duplicate`
is deprecated and ignored).
### Markdown Report
The markdown report provides a human-readable dashboard:
```markdown
# Edge Signal Aggregator Dashboard
**Generated:** 2026-03-02 07:00 UTC
## Summary
- Total Input Signals: 42
- Unique After Dedup: 28
- Contradictions: 3
- High Conviction (>=0.5): 12
## Top 10 Edge Ideas by Conviction
### 1. AI Infrastructure Capex Acceleration (Score: 0.87)
- **Tickers:** NVDA, AMD, AVGO
- **Direction:** LONG | **Horizon:** 3-6 months
- **Contributing Skills:**
- edge-candidate-agent: 0.92 (ticket_2026-03-01_001)
- theme-detector: 0.85 (theme_ai_infra)
- **Confidence Breakdown:** Agreement 0.30 | Strength 0.35 | Recency 0.22
...
## Contradictions Requiring Review
### Energy Sector Conflict
- **sector-analyst:** Bearish rotation (SHORT)
- **institutional-flow-tracker:** Heavy buying XLE (LONG)
- **Hint:** Check timeframe mismatch
## Deduplication Summary
- 14 signals merged into 8 unique themes
- Average similarity of merged signals: 0.89
Reports are saved to reports/ with filenames:
edge_signal_aggregator_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.jsonedge_signal_aggregator_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md
Resources
scripts/aggregate_signals.py-- Main aggregation script with CLI interfacereferences/signal-weighting-framework.md-- Rationale for default weights and scoring methodologyassets/default_weights.yaml-- Default skill weights configuration
Key Principles
- Provenance Tracking -- Every aggregated signal links back to its source skill and original reference
- Contradiction Transparency -- Conflicting signals are flagged, not hidden, to enable informed decisions
- Configurable Weights -- Default weights reflect typical reliability but can be customized per user
- Deduplication Without Loss -- Merged signals retain references to all original sources
- Actionable Output -- Ranked list with clear tickers, direction, and time horizon for each idea
- Idempotent Aggregation -- Re-ingesting the same evidence never inflates scores; agreement credit requires distinct skills AND distinct events
- Strict Score Validation -- NaN/infinity, negative, and out-of-range scores are rejected and reported, never converted into maximum confidence